MERCURY / EXECUTION STUDY

Execution policy comparison

Five execution policies on shared synthetic market streams. Cost includes deadline closeout, explicit fees and a penalty for residual inventory.

128 evaluation seeds per regime · 2,000 shares · 60 virtual seconds · stress run · maker fee 0 · taker fee 0 ticks/share

Baseline

Mean cost with ±1 standard error -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.4 3.4 4.4 adaptive aggressive passive pov twap Cost: ticks per parent-order share; lower is better
Worst 5% average cost (CVaR95) -1.2 1.3 3.8 6.2 8.7 11.2 adaptive aggressive passive pov twap Cost: ticks per parent-order share; lower is better
PolicyMeanSEP95CVaR95Fill rateΔ vs TWAPPaired SE
adaptive1.0890.1023.2653.84596.006%-0.1310.025
aggressive2.5000.0002.5002.500100.000%1.2800.103
passive3.9100.42810.00010.00058.488%2.6890.455
pov1.0170.1042.8954.02099.024%-0.2030.050
twap1.2200.1032.9674.14396.410%0.0000.000
95% bootstrap intervals

Percentile intervals conditional on these observed runs. Paired differences resample per-seed policy costs against TWAP; negative differences mean lower cost. Small holdouts may miss rare tails. Intervals do not account for model error or regime selection.

PolicyCVaR95, ticks/shareMean difference vs TWAP, ticks/share
adaptive[3.003, 4.800] (512 draws)[-0.184, -0.088] (512 draws)
aggressive[2.500, 2.500] (512 draws)[1.077, 1.480] (512 draws)
passive[10.000, 10.000] (512 draws)[1.806, 3.559] (512 draws)
pov[2.935, 5.187] (512 draws)[-0.304, -0.106] (512 draws)
twap[3.059, 5.451] (512 draws)[0.000, 0.000] (512 draws)